Source: radsecproxy
Version: 1.10.0-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org

Hi,

Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0], we noticed that
radsecproxy could not be built reproducibly.

This was because it embedded the current build date in the manual
pages. A patch is attached that seeds this from SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH
(if available).

 [0] https://reproducible-builds.org/


Regards,

-- 
      ,''`.
     : :'  :     Chris Lamb
     `. `'`      la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
       `-
--- a/debian/patches/reproducible-build 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
--- b/debian/patches/reproducible-build 2023-11-17 08:43:16.864943941 +0000
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+Description: Make the build reproducible
+Author: Chris Lamb <la...@debian.org>
+Last-Update: 2023-11-17
+
+--- radsecproxy-1.10.0.orig/configure.ac
++++ radsecproxy-1.10.0/configure.ac
+@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ AC_PROG_RANLIB
+ AC_CHECK_FUNCS([mallopt])
+ AC_REQUIRE_AUX_FILE([tap-driver.sh])
+ 
+-RELEASEDATE=m4_esyscmd([date +%Y-%m-%d])
++RELEASEDATE=m4_esyscmd([date --utc --date="@${SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH:-$(date 
+%s)}" +%Y-%m-%d])
+ AC_SUBST(RELEASEDATE)
+ 
+ m4_version_prereq(2.70, [], [AC_PROG_CC_C99])
--- a/debian/patches/series     2023-11-17 08:31:01.036451991 +0000
--- b/debian/patches/series     2023-11-17 08:43:15.736942848 +0000
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
 fix-spelling
+reproducible-build

Reply via email to