Dimitri John Ledkov <dimitri.led...@canonical.com> writes:

> Dak currently requires Checksums-Sha1, but I am happy to facilitate in
> patching dak to make Checksums-Sha1 optional if this bug report is
> accepted.

The field is documented as mandatory precisely because DAK requires it,
which makes it mandatory for Debian packages.  As soon as DAK doesn't
require it, I'm happy to make it optional (and indeed it would arguably be
a bug in Policy if it's optional in the archive but Policy claims it's
mandatory).

-- 
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org)              <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

Reply via email to