* David (Plasma) Paul [Wed Nov 29, 2023 at 03:47:50PM -0600]: > On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 12:48:31 +0100 Michael Prokop <m...@debian.org> wrote: > > * David (Plasma) Paul [Wed Oct 25, 2023 at 11:36:48PM -0500]:
[...] > > And the package description for says: > > > > | - debootsnap: Combines debootstrap and snapshot.debian.org to create a > > chroot > > | containing exactly the requested selection of packages. This can be used > > | to re-create a chroot from the past, for example to reproduce a bug. The > > | tool is also used by debrebuild to build a package in a chroot with > > build > > | dependencies in the same version as recorded in the buildinfo file. > > | [apt-utils, dpkg-dev, equivs, mmdebstrap, python3-pycurl] > > > > I can confirm that apt-utils, equivs, mmdebstrap and python3-pycurl, > > but also python3-debian and python3-requests seem to be required. > > > > Given that e.g. `equivs` is listed in both Recommends, but also in > > the `[...]` section of the debootsnap's description, maybe the list > > should be updated to: > > > > [apt-utils equivs mmdebstrap python3-debian python3-pycurl > > python3-requests] > > > > ? > > I concur. Given that dpkg-dev is already listed as a hard Dependency of > devscripts and given that debootsnap indeed requires python3-debian and > python3-requests, the list of packages following 'debootsnap' in the > Description stanza of devscripts' metadata should read: > > [apt-utils, equivs, mmdebstrap, python3-debian, python3-pycurl, > python3-requests] *nod* I implemented this at https://salsa.debian.org/debian/devscripts/-/merge_requests/374 regards -mika-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
