Chris, Thanks
On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 05:57:55PM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > * Mark Hindley <m...@hindley.org.uk>: > > On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 06:06:41PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > > > Please note that the start target refers to a non-existing > > > /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/85-hwclock.rules. The correct file is > > > /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/hwclock.rules instead. That file contains a > > > reference to rtc0 that probably needs fixing for Hurd as well. > > > > Hmmm, udev is linux only, so I imagine udev rules are cruft on Hurd. > > That would be my understanding as well. > > However on linux, the file should be named 85-hwclock.rules again. > Maybe this could be fixed too? Of course, queued and pending. > For hurd (and maybe linux), the big question remains, _if_ updating > the hwclock should be done by hwclock.sh by default. > I don't know the answer to this design question for hurd, or for > linux-with-sysvinit systems. I don't have a definitive answer either, but either way the script should not fail on Hurd and by downgrading the Depends to Recommends it is easy to change the behaviour if it is not to your liking. Mark
