Hej, Am Sonntag, 17. Dezember 2023, 00:33:58 CET schrieb Soren Stoutner: [...] > > No matter what angelfish does, qtwebview-opensource-src will in any > > case also need a rebuild. > > Qt WebView is deprecated upstream. It was based on the same Apple > WebKit source that WebViewGTK uses. It was replaced quite a while > ago by Qt WebEngine, which is based on Google’s Chromium. There is > no Qt 6 version of Qt WebView, so it will go entirely away at that > point.
There is one: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/qt6-webview Are you perhaps confusing Qt WebView with Qt WebKit ? > But this brings up an interesting question. Why are the Qt source > packages building private-dev binary packages? There was probably > some historical reason for doing so, but handling security support in > stable would be a lot easier if we stopped shipping private headers > that other packages can build- depends on. Perhaps Dmitry or Patrick > could provide some background. Usually, we try to avoid packaging the private headers. But for some packages, we just need to. And that's because other packages depend on them incl. other Qt submodules. We don't have a rule set in stone, but we usually package private headers when either another Qt submodule needs them (e.g. qtwebview needs the private headers of qtwebengine, hence we package them) or when important KDE components need them (e.g. qtwayland). -- Med vänliga hälsningar Patrick Franz
