Control: forwarded -1 https://salsa.debian.org/dns-team/bind9/-/merge_requests/26
On 27/11/23 09:12 PM, Arnaud Rebillout wrote: Hi, > In https://bugs.debian.org/1025519 was reported a bug in bind9 apparmor > configuration. It was fixed on the branch `debian/9.18`, with commit > https://salsa.debian.org/dns-team/bind9/-/commit/5c03f25e, and released > version `1:9.18.10-2` of bind9 (released in December 2022). > > However today the issue is back. The regression is due to the fact that > the commit 5c03f25e was not applied in the branch `debian/9.19`, which > is currently in Debian unstable. > > Looking at the changelog (on branch `debian/9.19`), it jumps straight > from `9.18.2-1` to `9.19.0-1`, makes me wonder how many good commits > from the branch 9.18 are missing in the branch 9.19... Please have a > look, and at least apply 5c03f25e, it's a must! I have taken a look and identified four missing commits. @Ondrej: Could you have a look at https://salsa.debian.org/dns-team/bind9/-/merge_requests/26 ? Bernhard
