Am Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 12:08:54PM +0100 schrieb Chris Hofstaedtler: > On Sun, Sep 03, 2023 at 08:26:00PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > severity 877016 serious > > thanks > > > > Am Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 06:51:30AM -0700 schrieb Mattia Dongili: > > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 03:16:52PM -0400, Phil Susi wrote: > > > > Package: cpufrequtils > > > > Version: 008-1 > > > ... > > > > is the case, should cpufrequtils not be removed now? > > > > > > Yes, indeed it should. Thanks for nagging. > > > > Bumping the severity to RC to move forward with this for trixie. > > > > $ dak rm -nR cpufrequtils > Will remove the following packages from unstable: > > cpufrequtils | 008-2 | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, > mips64el, s390x > libcpufreq-dev | 008-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, > ppc64el, s390x > libcpufreq-dev | 008-2+b1 | riscv64 > libcpufreq0 | 008-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, > ppc64el, s390x > libcpufreq0 | 008-2+b1 | riscv64 > > Maintainer: Seunghun Han <kkama...@gmail.com> > > ------------------- Reason ------------------- > > ---------------------------------------------- > > Checking reverse dependencies... > No dependency problem found. > > Seems like it's good to go?
Given the original bug to suggest it's removal is from 2017, I think it's safe to say that anyone had a chance to object to it's removal :-) Cheers, Moritz