On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 10:24:06AM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> Control: tags 1060246 + patch
> Control: tags 1060246 + pending
> 
> Dear maintainer,
> 
> I have prepared the following NMU, taking into consideration the
> feedback to only override the ABI on the affected architectures.
> 
> I'm not sure I want to upload it now, but as it stands, anything
> build-depending on libapt-pkg-perl and other perl bindings to t64
> libraries will FTBFS.
> 
> I uploaded it to Ubuntu but it's stuck waiting for db5.3; I believe
> vorlon has done binary-uploads for db5.3 in Debian to unblock it
> there though.
> 
> Let me know what you think.

Thanks.

It's clear that the perlapi names need to be bumped on the affected
ports like this patch does. Just binNMU'ing perl as-is would lead to a
perl that can't load the binary modules in arch:any lib*-perl packages
in the archive.

I'm much less clear on whether a libperl5.38t64 package will be needed.

Any necessary NMUs are welcome (assuming the uploader takes the normal
responsibility of course). I don't intend to upload time64 related changes
myself (at least not on any kind of a short notice after waiting a month
for comments.)

No idea if the test failures mentioned in this bug will block things,
but I'm sure the uploader will find out.

That said,

> +ifeq (,$(findstring $(DEB_HOST_ARCH), amd64 arm64 hurd-i386 i386 mips64el 
> ppc64el riscv64 s390x))

isn't this a substring match where i386 already covers hurd-i386? Guess
that doesn't matter much though and none of those words match any intended
port architectures.
-- 
Niko

Reply via email to