Source: mcrypt Version: 2.6.8-6 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused by a change in dpkg 1.22.6, that enabled -Werror=implicit-function-declaration. For more information, see https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS#A2024-03-13_-Werror.3Dimplicit-function-declaration Relevant part (hopefully): > gcc -o gaaout.o -c gaaout.c -DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/share/locale\" -I../intl -g > -O2 -Werror=implicit-function-declaration > -ffile-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=. -fstack-protector-strong > -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat -Werror=format-security -fcf-protection > -I/usr/include -Wall -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -I. -I.. > getpass.c: In function ‘readpass’: > getpass.c:98:18: warning: the comparison will always evaluate as ‘false’ for > the address of ‘input’ will never be NULL [-Waddress] > 98 | if (input==NULL) return NULL; > | ^~ > getpass.c:93:21: note: ‘input’ declared here > 93 | static char input[MAXLEN + 1]; > | ^~~~~ > getpass.c:104:12: warning: pointer targets in assignment from ‘char *’ to > ‘unsigned char *’ differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] > 104 | ap = asterix; > | ^ > rfc2440.c: In function ‘dek_load’: > rfc2440.c:566:42: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 5 of > ‘mhash_keygen_ext’ differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] > 566 | DIM (d->key), pass, strlen(pass)); > | ^~~~ > | | > | char * > In file included from /usr/include/mhash.h:10, > from ./defines.h:8, > from rfc2440.c:18: > /usr/include/mutils/mhash.h:108:45: note: expected ‘uint8_t *’ {aka ‘unsigned > char *’} but argument is of type ‘char *’ > 108 | mutils_word8 *password, mutils_word32 > passwordlen); > | ^ > rfc2440.c: In function ‘dek_create’: > rfc2440.c:617:42: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 5 of > ‘mhash_keygen_ext’ differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] > 617 | DIM (d->key), pass, strlen(pass)); > | ^~~~ > | | > | char * > /usr/include/mutils/mhash.h:108:45: note: expected ‘uint8_t *’ {aka ‘unsigned > char *’} but argument is of type ‘char *’ > 108 | mutils_word8 *password, mutils_word32 > passwordlen); > | ^ > rfc2440.c: In function ‘symkey_enc_decode’: > rfc2440.c:635:27: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of > ‘header_decode’ differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] > 635 | header_decode(dat->d, &tag, &headlen, &offset, NULL); > | ^~~~ > | | > | int * > rfc2440.c:426:41: note: expected ‘uint32 *’ {aka ‘unsigned int *’} but > argument is of type ‘int *’ > 426 | header_decode(const uchar *buf, uint32 *tag, uint32 *len, > | ~~~~~~~~^~~ > rfc2440.c:635:33: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 3 of > ‘header_decode’ differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] > 635 | header_decode(dat->d, &tag, &headlen, &offset, NULL); > | ^~~~~~~~ > | | > | int * > rfc2440.c:426:54: note: expected ‘uint32 *’ {aka ‘unsigned int *’} but > argument is of type ‘int *’ > 426 | header_decode(const uchar *buf, uint32 *tag, uint32 *len, > | ~~~~~~~~^~~ > rfc2440.c:635:43: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 4 of > ‘header_decode’ differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] > 635 | header_decode(dat->d, &tag, &headlen, &offset, NULL); > | ^~~~~~~ > | | > | int * > rfc2440.c:427:23: note: expected ‘uint32 *’ {aka ‘unsigned int *’} but > argument is of type ‘int *’ > 427 | uint32 *headlen, PACKET *pkt) > | ~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~ > rfc2440.c: In function ‘file_to_buf’: > rfc2440.c:123:5: warning: ignoring return value of ‘fread’ declared with > attribute ‘warn_unused_result’ [-Wunused-result] > 123 | fread(buf, 1, len, fp); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > mcrypt.gaa: In function ‘gaa_try’: > mcrypt.gaa:109:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘mcrypt_license’; > did you mean ‘mcrypt_free’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > 109 | option (L, license) { mcrypt_license(); exit(0); } "Displays license > information." > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > | mcrypt_free > mcrypt.gaa:108:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘mcrypt_version’; > did you mean ‘mcrypt_perror’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > 108 | option (v, version) { mcrypt_version(); exit(0); } "Prints the > version number" > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > | mcrypt_perror > mcrypt.gaa:107:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘usage’ > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > 107 | option (help) { usage(); exit(0); } "Prints this help" > | ^~~~~ > mcrypt.gaa:99:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘print_hashlist’ > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > 99 | option (list-hash) { print_hashlist(); exit(0); } "Prints a list of > the supported hash algorithms." > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > mcrypt.gaa:98:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘print_keylist’ > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > 98 | option (list-keymodes) { print_keylist(); exit(0); } "Prints a list > of the supported key modes." > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ > mcrypt.gaa:97:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘print_list’ > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > 97 | option (list) { print_list(); exit(0); } "Prints a list of the > supported algorithms and modes." > | ^~~~~~~~~~ > gaa.skel: At top level: > gaa.skel:339:14: warning: ‘gaa_getfloat’ defined but not used > [-Wunused-function] > gaa.skel:325:13: warning: ‘gaa_getchar’ defined but not used > [-Wunused-function] > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > make[3]: *** [Makefile:738: gaaout.o] Error 1 The full build log is available from: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2024/03/13/mcrypt_2.6.8-6_unstable.log All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20240313;users=lu...@debian.org or: https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20240313&fusertaguser=lu...@debian.org&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.
