Hi Osamu, Prior to the LXD/Incus hard fork, I did have an ITP to look at packaging lxd-ui (#1036926). I think the "proper" way to package Incus UI would be to have it as a new package (incus-ui), which incus packaging could then Recommend or Suggest.
I would also be more comfortable with Incus UI it was a proper fork of Canonical's repository that carried the seven patches from zabbly/incus. As a packager, we shouldn't be taking one upstream and totally transforming it into something else via patches since that's just too much work to carry in our packaging. :) My suggestion would be to rework this bug into a RFP and/or merge with the prior ITP. I don't have any plans to work on this, but someone else might. Mathias
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
