Hi Bo,

Thanks for the short reaction time and for spending your time on this
bug, much appreciated!

On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 01:26:35PM +0800, Bo YU wrote:
> Thanks your detailed analysis for it. I have uploaded -3 to unstable to
> hope to unblock tox migrating. But these are some unexpected maybe.

tox has migrated since. Honestly I'm not sure why, given the regression!
So there isn't as much urgency as there was when I filed this bug, I'd
say.

> This will lead a autopkgtest on s390x[0] again from its tracker page[1] to
> get the link(UTC+8 13:06 2024/03/22).
> 
> But another retry on s390x it passed on s390x[2].
> 
> [0]: https://ci.debian.net/packages/t/tox-current-env/testing/s390x/44235641/
> [1]: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/tox-current-env
> [2]: https://ci.debian.net/packages/t/tox-current-env/

Yup, looks like the same bug all over the place, effectively a race.

> Do you think I will need to upload it to unstable again with `sorted`
> for `test_allenvs_print_deps_to_file` as I analyzed above?

It's clearly a bug IMHO, so it'd be good to fix at some point. No
urgency with regards to the tox migration as I said, but this will
happen again on e.g. the next tox upload.

If I were you I'd fix it in git, submit all of these fixes to upstream,
wait a month or two so in case upstream releases a new version
(hopefully with these), and then upload regardless.

Thanks again,
Faidon

Reply via email to