On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 06:21:45PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote: > My problem is with the wording of your bug report, you demand the file > mustn't be recreated. If you now qualify that by saying that if the user > does indeed enter a frequency again then it's OK to recreate the file, > then I indeed don't have a problem anymore. > > > >> I'd offer to write a patch if you don't want to, or don't have time to > > >> dig into this. > > > > > > If you could take into account all possible situations... then please. > > > Note that I am in the process of packaging 2.9, and the maintainer > > > script will be changed a lot (I'm taking out support for upgrading from > > > before woody, which will simplify things and which should be more than > > > enough). > > > > Is the new maintainer script available somewhere? > > Not yet.
Hello Paul, what is the status with this package ? As a result of this problem, wwwoffle has been removed from testing. Cheers, -- Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
