* Cyril Brulebois <k...@debian.org> [2024-04-13 08:25]: > I don't mind doing that again, but what's the game plan here? If systems > are already installed and working fine, then d-i is irrelevant.
Well, maybe someone wants to install Debian, either because they find an old OpenRD somewhere or because Rick's hard drive dies or something. > For any new systems people might want to deploy, installing bullseye > then upgrading to bookworm already works? Of course, but bullseye will be moved to archive.d.o at some point (I know you can install from there, but then you have to specify the mirror). Anyway, I have no game play. Like I said, it's probably all a waste of time, but Debian bookworm works on OpenRD and d-i should work if we add the image, we already have a patch... so it seems like we should just do it. My game play is that I'm a perfectionist but I am aware there are pretty much no users of Debian on OpenRD (I only know of Rick!). > So OpenRD has no future in trixie as far as I understand. At least that > would mean not having to do that again again, if we were to enable > OpenRD images again for bookworm. Yes, imho let's add the image for bookworm and let this be the end of it. ;) But if you just want to close this feature request, I doubt many people will care. -- Martin Michlmayr https://www.cyrius.com/
