Source: rcs-blame
Version: 1.3.1-4.2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: [email protected]
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-armhf
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
> -D_TIME_BITS=64 -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -O3
> -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -ffile-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=.
> -fstack-protector-strong -fstack-clash-protection -fcommon -c mktime.c
> mktime.c: In function ‘ydhms_diff’:
> mktime.c:106:52: error: size of array ‘a’ is negative
> 106 | #define verify(name, assertion) struct name { char a[(assertion) ? 1
> : -1]; }
> | ^
> mktime.c:170:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘verify’
> 170 | verify (long_int_year_and_yday_are_wide_enough,
> | ^~~~~~
> make[4]: *** [Makefile:441: mktime.o] Error 1
The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2024/04/20/rcs-blame_1.3.1-4.2_unstable-armhf.log
All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20240420;[email protected]
or:
https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20240420&[email protected]&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results
A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects
If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.
