09.04.2024 16:48, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Marco d'Itri <m...@linux.it> (2024-04-09):
Yes. Nowadays kmod has many more features related to compressed modules
and verification of signatures.
Can we agree that kmod should provide these programs for d-i?
Or can the d-i maintainers just tell us what they want?
I meant to come back to this after experimenting, then things happened…
I picked kmod at the time because it worked, and because busybox didn't
work, which I summed up in:
https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer/-/commit/450daf0bd24ee94d4f466ab65908c079ef795145
(plus follow-up commit, woopsie
https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer/-/commit/69777be465c5d0210d16159a456ab88535513a07
)
I'm fine with sticking to kmod regarding module support in d-i. I'm not
sure we should keep support in two different modules, so dropping it
from busybox would work for me. Others might have different views on
this, though.
So, should I disable module utils in busybox-udeb now?
Wanted to spare some time on busybox, this bug report come in.
Is kmod udeb ready and used in d-i already, or does it need some
prep first?
Thanks,
/mjt
--
GPG Key transition (from rsa2048 to rsa4096) since 2024-04-24.
New key: rsa4096/61AD3D98ECDF2C8E 9D8B E14E 3F2A 9DD7 9199 28F1 61AD 3D98
ECDF 2C8E
Old key: rsa2048/457CE0A0804465C5 6EE1 95D1 886E 8FFB 810D 4324 457C E0A0
8044 65C5
Transition statement: http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/gpg-transition-2024.txt
