On 26/04/2024 18.54, Dirk Lehmann wrote:
No, I am currently don't have `gnutls-bin` installed. Just `gnutls-bin` and the sources are versioned to 3.8.5-2.
That was the most plausible package depending on libgnutls-dane0 ...
In sid and testing the binary packages `libgnutls30` and `libgnutls-dane0` are consistent versioned to 3.8.3-1 here. Can you confirm that the binaries of the libs are versioned to `3.8.5-2` on your side?
Yes. sid may have some cruft 3.8.3-1 packages (with the old library package names) sitting around until everything depending on them is gone from sid. But such packages should have been removed from testing already (except armel/armhf, where this will happen soon) $ rmadison -s sid,testing libgnutls-dane0 libgnutls-dane0t64 libgnutls30 libgnutls30t64 libgnutls-dane0 | 3.8.3-1 | testing | armel, armhf libgnutls-dane0 | 3.8.3-1 | unstable | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x libgnutls-dane0t64 | 3.8.5-2 | testing | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, ppc64el, s390x libgnutls-dane0t64 | 3.8.5-2 | unstable | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x libgnutls30 | 3.8.3-1 | testing | armel, armhf libgnutls30 | 3.8.3-1 | unstable | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x libgnutls30t64 | 3.8.5-2 | testing | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, ppc64el, s390x libgnutls30t64 | 3.8.5-2 | unstable | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x
Yes, thanks that works, I used $> apt-get install libgnutls-dane0t64
Does dist-upgrade work again now? Andreas
