On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 06:46:00PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: > On 4/29/24 18:31, David Lamparter wrote: > > Did you run into issues that forced you up to 2.1.148? The "officially > > listed" (= in configure.ac) requirement is 2.1.128, if we(upstream) > > missed something I'd look into getting that listed minimum bumped up > > too. > > Rechecking the frr 10 announcement.. says indeed 2.1.128 not 2.1.148. > totally my fault, I'm very sorry about that!
Ok, all good then, just wanted to confirm. > (I'm running frr 10 with 2.1.148 here since some days now with no issues > though) I would really hope that a newer version works... generally the libyang folks have been pretty good about not breaking compatibility, though there was one issue: https://github.com/CESNET/libyang/issues/2090 (=> 2.1.111 is "known bad") > > Is there some way to debug this? > > You can ask for (hppa) porterbox access; accounts to porterboxes are > given to non-DD/DMs too: > > https://dsa.debian.org/doc/guest-account/ > > If you send me the data requested there, I'll sign it so you can get access. Ok, for the time being I've instead decided to use this as a kick in my ass to finally do the NM procedure to become a Debian Maintainer... https://nm.debian.org/process/1284/ I have no idea what kind of timescale that works on, but I probably can't get to hppa debugging right off anyway - worst case I'd ping you later? Thanks, -equi
