On Monday, 27 May 2024 17:25:02 CEST Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > Thanks for that. Just one note regarding the word "upstream". The > current upstream of the package is the osmo fork. At the time when > uploading previous version, that fork was looking more reliable than the > main branch.
Yeah, it was/is a bit confusing, hence my next reply contained: On 27 May 2024 10:40:24 +0200 Diederik de Haas <didi.deb...@cknow.org> wrote: > Forgot to mention that that commit is part of upstream's 3.4.0~rc1, > but it's unclear to me what is considered upstream now. The ``debian/watch`` file points to one repo, but the ``upstream`` branch (indeed) indicated that came from another repo.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
