control: tags -1 + moreinfo
thanks
On Sat, 21 Feb 2015 14:57:15 +0000 Andrew Gallagher <andr...@andrewg.com> wrote:
> spamd no longer suffixes "(closed before headers)" with "at /usr/sbin/spamd
> line N"
>
> Updated rule attached. This may also apply to other errors that I haven't
> been able to test yet.
It's a shame no-one replied to this bug fro 2015
The attached file contains:
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ spamd\[[0-9]+\]:( spamd:)? bad
protocol: header error: \(closed before headers\)( at /usr/sbin/spamd
line 2001.)?$
This looks problematic because
- if the suffix is no longer produced the rule should not include it as optional
- why is 2001 hardcoded?
If there is still interest in adding/updating rules we'd need an
update to confirm what the rules should look like in 2024,
