Control: tags -1 -upstream
Control: close -1

On Tue, 5 Jul 2022 00:28:21 +0200 Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org>
wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + upstream
> On Fri, 8 Apr 2022 10:32:05 +0200 Laurent Bonnaud 
> <l.bonn...@laposte.net> wrote:
> > On 4/7/22 18:41, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
> > 
> > > However I got it to work nevertheless by adding the "ro" mount
option
> > > in /etc/fstab for the root file system
> > 
> > This "solves" the quotacheck problem, but unfortunately it has many
other negative consequences, such as:
> > 
> > Apr 08 05:01:29 hostname systemd[1]: swapfile.swap: Swap process
exited, code=exited, status=255/EXCEPTION
> > Apr 08 05:01:29 hostname systemd[1]: swapfile.swap: Failed with
result 'exit-code'.
> > Apr 08 05:01:29 hostname systemd[1]: Failed to activate swap
/swapfile.
> > 
> > Apr 08 05:01:30 hostname systemd-tmpfiles[522]: rm_rf(/tmp): Read-
only file system
> > 
> > Apr 08 05:01:30 hostname systemd[539]: systemd-timesyncd.service:
Failed to set up mount namespacing: /run/systemd/unit-root/dev: Read-
only file system
> > Apr 08 05:01:30 hostname systemd[539]: systemd-timesyncd.service:
Failed at step NAMESPACE spawning /lib/systemd/systemd-timesyncd: Read-
only file system
> > 
> > Such this "solution" can only be used as a "one shot" trick
followed by a proper reboot with a rw file system.
> 
> 
> I assume you are using stable.
> Can you please test, if you can still reproduce this with v250 from 
> bullseye-backports and if so, report this upstream at
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues

No answer nor upstream report in 2 years, closing.

-- 
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to