On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 11:00:14PM -0600, Shaun Jackman wrote: > On 6/4/06, Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Apparently, yes, it is! How's this for irony. The QA upload of > >> 0.1.2.2-4 reverted the changes from 0.1.2.2-3 and broke the package! > >> Funny. > > > >How's that? I just took what was in unstable and rebuilt it. I don't go > >reverting things. Strange in this particular case how I did two uploads of > >the package though... > > > >Too long (and too many packages) ago to remember the specifics. > > The issue is that I uploaded -3; it was not a QA upload. My changes in > -3 seem to have been omitted from the QA upload of -4. See (far) below > for the changelog from my -3 upload. >
Sure, I read the changelog before composing my previous email. My point remains: when I do a QA upload, I take what's currently in unstable. The only possibility, (and it's quite possible, given that I appear to have uploaded this package twice) is I downloaded what was in unstable at some point between you making your upload and me making mine. If this is the case, then I am entirely at fault, and need to stop working in a vacuum, and apologise profusely. regards Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
