Hi Peter, sorry if I did anything wrong. However the way I see it is that: on a clean Debian system, Lazarus does NOT compile.. It does on my ARch and Fedora machines, so it is very Debian specific
All the best Bas Sent with Proton Mail secure email. On Friday, June 14th, 2024 at 15:11, Peter B <pe...@pblackman.plus.com> wrote: > On 07/06/2024 02:26, Bas van Besouw wrote: > > > Package: lazarus > > Version: 3.0+dfsg1-8 > > Severity: serious > > Tags: ftbfs > > > Hi Bas, > > some general points about bug reporting; > > 1) The tag ftbfs is used when the package does not build from the > debian source (using debuild or whatever) > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=lazarus > Lazarus is building fine from source. > > When a compiler fails to build something locally, that is not ftbfs. > If the package really was ftbfs, there would be nothing for users to > install. > > > 2) The severity serious means a "severe violation of Debian policy". > > https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities > > Lazarus failing to rebuild the IDE, but generally working fine apart > from that, is unfortunate, and definitely > a [Normal] bug, but it is hardly a "severe violation of Debian policy". > > > Regards, > Peter > > P.S. I can reproduce this problem too, with both 3.0 & 3.4 Debian > packages, > but rebuilding the IDE works with the Arch Linux 3.4 package.
