Hi Alan, Thanks for making another update of the package. Your effort and contribution to Debian is very much welcomed.
Review... 1. Build: OK 2. Lintian: OK - See Additional: A 3. Licenses check: OK 4. Build Twice (sudo pbuilder build --twice <package>.dsc): OK 5. Install (No previous installs): OK 6. Upgrade (Over previous installs if any): N/A Additional... A. The lintian warnings emitted for pandoc documentation conversation are as you say well known due to the age of the pandoc package in Debian and its need to be updated. These warnings can be safely ignored and should not block this package from being uploaded into Debian. I supply a link below to a bug report that is requesting an update of the pandoc package. People may wish to add notes also wishing it to be updated and also subscribe to the bug and follow any progress. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068734 B. 'debian/watch' This is a conversation piece. Mentors reports via checks that 'A watch file is present but doesn't work'. Would it be better for the package to have no watch file and it be reported as that and have an explanation in the README.debian of why it is this way, which you generally have already? Just something to think upon for a future upload. I believe this package is now ready for sponsorship/upload. Could a Debian Developer (DD) with available free time, please review this package and upload if you feel it is ready and appropriate for the distribution. Regards Phil -- Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
