Bug#254210: memtest86+: Memtest86+ incorrectly generates BadRAM-patch location information

[Fabio Fantoni]

Il 05/07/2024 15:56, Ferenc Wágner ha scritto:

On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 11:42:31 +0100 Fabio Fantoni <fantonifa...@tiscali.it> 
wrote:

I saw on upstream git history that there was some improvements related
to badram output included in 6.10:
https://github.com/memtest86plus/memtest86plus/pull/178

Judging by its title that pull request does not target correctness.  The
bookworm version of memtest86+ definitely reports wrong BadRAM patterns.
Upstream 7.00 reports them correctly.  I haven't checked the bookworm-
backports version.

if someone will test it please tell me if sectors reported to set in
badram works correctly in 6.10 and this bug can be closed

Not for 6.10.

Thanks for report, if 7.00 report correctly so you can use bookworm-backports that have it From a fast look to upstream repository there is another fix related in 7.00: https://github.com/memtest86plus/memtest86plus/commit/df803bf2942747457c7275439c0b4da4e3e287f1

If will be confirmed that is fully solved I'll close this

OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature