On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 13:03:22 +1200 Andrew Bartlett <abart...@samba.org> wrote: > Just a warning that trying to brute force a fix for this is likely to > end badly. A lot of developer time was spent to get to this current > delicate situation, which relied on the narrow behaviour that is now > eliminated by the Debian time_t 64 transition rules. > > Socket-wrapper starts with: > > /* > * Make sure we do not redirect (f)open(at)() or fcntl() to their 64bit > * variants > */ > #undef _FILE_OFFSET_BITS > > This was added in > https://gitlab.com/cwrap/socket_wrapper/-/commit/bbe14cc3200ca553b13ed49357e2e88ba487eeaa > > Setting -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 will break the fcntl64 wrapper and so > break Samba's tests. > > I don't know if there is a good fix for this actually. > > Andrew Bartlett
How about simply dropping armv7 support from socket-wrapper and uid- wrapper? Having architectures that are actually used being blocked by these issues is suboptimal at best -- Kind regards, Luca Boccassi
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
