Package: fortune-mod Version: 1:1.99.1-7.3 Severity: important Dear Maintainer,
As per Bug #1024501 (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024501), there is no reason to disable the fortunes-off package as per the debian code of conduct. Quoting from Roberto's(<robx...@debxan.oxg>) response in the aforementioned ticket: <quote> Since it is evident that the Code of Conduct does not apply to the content of packages in this way (nor can it), and absent a clear policy permitting the removal of a package based on its content not being agreeable, can we close this bug report? </quote> However the fortunes-off sub-package has been disabled in Bookworm as per changelog for version 1.99.1-7.2 at https://sources.debian.org/src/fortune-mod/1%3A1.99.1-7.3/debian/changelog/ I request that this unilateral removal be reversed. -- System Information: Debian Release: 12.6 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-22-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=en_IN, LC_CTYPE=en_IN (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_IN:en Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages fortune-mod depends on: ii libc6 2.36-9+deb12u7 ii librecode0 3.6-25 Versions of packages fortune-mod recommends: ii fortunes [fortune-cookie-db] 1:1.99.1-7.3 ii fortunes-min [fortune-cookie-db] 1:1.99.1-7.3 ii fortunes-off [fortune-cookie-db] 1:1.99.1-7build1 Versions of packages fortune-mod suggests: ii bsdmainutils 12.1.8 ii fortunes 1:1.99.1-7.3 ii x11-utils 7.7+5 -- no debconf information Regards, -- Samveen The best-laid schemes o' mice an 'men Gang aft agley, An'lea'e us nought but grief an' pain, For promis'd joy! -- Robert Burns (The best laid plans of mice and men often go awry, and bring nothing but grief and pain of the ..)
