Hi,On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 19:57:25 +0200 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebast...@breakpoint.cc> wrote:
I'm sorry if this is causing trouble. I splitted the legacy provider out and added a Recommends: assuming that it is pulled in by default. It did not pop on the debci.
It also breaks reproducible builds: https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/stats_breakages_100d.png (via diffoscope breakage).
Is this causing enough trouble that you would say it needs a Depends: until this is resolved?
I'd say so (with Release Team member hat on).I agree with Colin, aligning this with cryptography upstream sounds like a smart idea to avoid Debianisms that are going to hurt us in the long run. For avoidance of doubt, I'm absolutely not against Debianisms, as long as Debian believes they deliver improvements to our users, but they always come with a cost.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
