* Holger Levsen <hol...@layer-acht.org> [2024-08-18 09:12]: > On Sun, Aug 18, 2024 at 07:10:45AM +0000, Holger Levsen wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 17, 2024 at 09:08:27PM +0000, FC (Fay) Stegerman (@obfusk) > > wrote: > > > FC (Fay) Stegerman commented: > > > https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/-/issues/389#note_516514 > > > See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1078747 > > > > also pretty visible here: > > > > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/stats_breakages_100d.png > > filing this as a proper BTS bug to prevent migration to trixie.
Am I missing something here? Because diffoscope 274 is already in trixie. And the issue isn't a result of a change to diffoscope itself but a result of python3-cryptography (imported by python3-pypdf, which diffoscope recommends) not working without openssl-provider-legacy (or a workaround). So presumably we will see the same issues in trixie when openssl migrates. Interestingly, python3-cryptography isn't actually a dependency of python3-pypdf (it recommends python3-pycryptodome instead). But it tries to load cryptography -- which something else must have pulled in -- first, and only catches ImportError, not this RuntimeError. - Fay
