Hi!

On Sun, 2024-08-25 at 10:04:33 +0800, Sean Whitton wrote:
> On Thu 15 Aug 2024 at 11:07am +02, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > How about adding
> >
> > """
> > The default for Rules-Requires-Root depends on the dpkg-build-api level (the
> > dpkg-build-api is defined in "man 7 dpkg-build-api"). At level 0 (or when 
> > not
> > declared), Rules-Requires-Root defaults to binary-targets. In later 
> > versions,
> > it defaults to no.
> > """
> >
> > in 5.6.31 and then removing the `(default)` next `binary-targets` in 5.6.31?
> >
> > I think that would do wonders.
> 
> Based on this I came up with the following, which I think is slightly
> cleaner than adding a whole paragraph.  Would you mind checking it?


> -- >8 --
> Subject: [PATCH] Update specification of the default value for
>  Rules-Requires-Root
> 
> ---
>  debian/changelog            |  2 ++
>  policy/ch-controlfields.rst | 17 ++++++++++-------
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
> index c1fc3c3..2d5d204 100644
> --- a/debian/changelog
> +++ b/debian/changelog
> @@ -4,6 +4,8 @@ debian-policy (4.7.0.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
>      Thanks to Paul Gevers for the report.
>    * Fix markup problem in 3.9 (Closes: #1074040).
>      Thanks to Ke Zhang for the report & patch.
> +  * Update specification of the default value for Rules-Requires-Root.
> +    See #1057238.
> 
>   -- Sean Whitton <spwhit...@spwhitton.name>  Sun, 07 Apr 2024 15:34:08 +0800
> 
> diff --git a/policy/ch-controlfields.rst b/policy/ch-controlfields.rst
> index ecccbe9..530755a 100644
> --- a/policy/ch-controlfields.rst
> +++ b/policy/ch-controlfields.rst
> @@ -1204,14 +1204,14 @@ script: debian/rules <s-debianrules>`.
> 
>  The field can consist of exactly one of the following three items:
> 
> - - ``no``: Declares that neither root nor fakeroot is required.
> -   Package builders (e.g. dpkg-buildpackage) may choose to invoke any
> -   target in ``debian/rules`` with an unprivileged user.
> + - ``no`` (default at dpkg-build-api level >=1): Declares that neither root
> +   nor fakeroot is required.  Package builders (e.g. dpkg-buildpackage) may
> +   choose to invoke any target in ``debian/rules`` with an unprivileged user.
> 
> - - ``binary-targets`` (default): Declares that the package will need
> -   the root (or fakeroot) when either of the ``binary``,
> -   ``binary-arch`` or ``binary-indep`` targets are called.  This is
> -   how every tool behaved before this field was defined.
> + - ``binary-targets`` (default at dpkg-build-api level 0): Declares that the
> +   package will need the root (or fakeroot) when either of the ``binary``,
> +   ``binary-arch`` or ``binary-indep`` targets are called.  This is how every
> +   tool behaved before this field was defined.
> 
>   - A space separated list of keywords described below.  These keywords
>     must always contain a forward slash, which sets them apart from the
> @@ -1222,6 +1222,9 @@ The field can consist of exactly one of the following 
> three items:
>     to ``binary-targets``, and both the builder and the package's
>     ``debian/rules`` script must downgrade accordingly (see below).
> 
> +The default depends on the dpkg-build-api level (see dpkg-build-api(7)).
> +If the dpkg-build-api level is undeclared, it is equivalent to level 0.
> +
>  If the package builder supports the ``Rules-Requires-Root`` field and
>  wants to enable the feature, then it must set the environment variable
>  ``DEB_RULES_REQUIRES_ROOT`` when invoking the package building script

Ah, indeed, this looks better to me too!

Thanks,
Guillem

Reply via email to