On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 01:28:13 +0100 Hibby <hi...@debian.org> wrote: > So far, I have not been able to make this 1.4.7 toy *or* mjeanson's 1.4.6 & > 1.4.5 releases build in my `sbuild` environment. Michael - how are you > building this? I did a quick dirty backport to bookworm and it still failed > for me. > > It fails due to failing tests [4] - this is true of 1.4.7-1 too, and > disconcertingly there are different tests failing on salsa [5]. I think we > need to work out *if* there is an issue here and if there is a regression > between sid and bookworm.
I've updated my repo to 1.4.7, it builds on my system but there is still one failing test (tests/mlmmj:mod_get_addr_type) and on salsa some different tests are failing, unfortunately I don't really have time to investigate. > Trying to working around that, it fails if I I deploy the nocheck profile [6] > - see line 1511. Package can't find, libatf-dev, which tracks - that's a > <!nocheck> dependency and we're building without it. This will need to be > fixed if we take the dh13 packaging approach and is probably worth reporting > upstream as a bug if someone else can verify it. Interesting aside - these > tests took minutes on my arm macbook, pegging one core at 100% but seconds > on x86! I wonder what's going on here. Once things build I might have a play > on a porterbox to dig into it. I fixed the <nocheck> profile, it was missing the configure switch.
