On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 11:23:59AM +0900, Horms wrote: > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 08:48:30AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 04:48:26PM +0900, Horms wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 07:46:16AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 12:17:23PM +0900, Horms wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > I would also like to have kernel-image-sparc-2.2, and > > > > > kernel-source-2.6.9 and its associated image and patch packages > > > > > removed. 2.6.9 is dead and 2.6.10 has replaced it. If you have > > > > > an architecture for which 2.6.10 is broken, now is your chance to > > > > > speak up. Below is a list of packages that I nominate for removal. > > > > > Ack, means that person spoke to me on IRC and agreed the package > > > > > should be > > > > > removed. > > > > > > > > Also, this would be the perfect time to NEW-process the powerpc 2.6.10 > > > > kernel. > > > > > > Yes, I mentioned this to AJ as well. > > > > Yep, but not mentioned here. > > But they are now because you have now mentioned them below. > The reason I CCed a bunch of people on my post last week > was to get them to add the relevant bits that are missing.
Yep, which is why i mentioned them :) > > > Could you please log which kernels you have pending in new > > > against this bug so he can see it when I prod him next? > > > > kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.10, versions 2.6.10-1, 2.6.10-2, and 2.6.10-3. > > Presumably only 2.6.10-3 shold go into d.o, right? Yes, but the ftp-masters know how to handle this right, and will accept all three, and the two first will just vanish. > > The other issue will be my new kernel-patch-powerpc-2.4.27 upload, which > > will > > obsolet the -apus kernels, and will thus need NEW processing, and the > > kernel-image-latest packages which is now in NEW for almost two month, and i > > got indirect info that i need to make a new upload of it or something. > > That sounds like an issue that needs some discussion, > I take it that is what the recent discussions on > debian-kernel/debian-boot about powerpc-2.4.27. > Is this correct? Indeed. I uploaded the .udebs for d-i which are based on those, and which didn't need NEW. As joeyh and vorlon mentioned, these .udebs are now in unstable, but not the accompanying source they are built upon, which is a violation of the GPL as long as 2.4.27-3 remains in NEW, i think. Not all that important, but i hope that we can sort this technically in the future. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
