On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 07:57:30AM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote: > Hi Dom, > > I am checking old rc bugs in unstable to see whether affected packages > should be removed and this bug popped up. > > On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 12:13:47PM +0000, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > I'm going to create more specific bugs per test failure in the perl > > soon, and then those can be reassigned to hurd as needed where there > > is functionality missing in hurd. When we have a good idea of what issues > > are present, we can revisit the severity of this bug (of course, you are > > free to downgrade this now if you prefer). > > Did this get any further? > > I looked at a current perl build for hurd-i386 and indeed there are > quite a few tests that are being skipped, buut i386 has a similar number > of skips. Could you mark this bug as being blocked by the individual > failures? If there are no individual failures left, can this bug be > closed?
I don't remember I'm afraid, and won't have any time to work on this any time soon. I don't have current context on the state of the hurd port to know whether this bug should be closed - I guess that is for debian-hurd@ to comment on.
