On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 11:47:46AM +0200, Sascha Steinbiss wrote:
> thanks for letting me know!
> 
> > Please migrate your package to the fuse3 library, which is actively
> > maintained. It would be great if we could remove fuse 2.x in the
> > forky development cycle.
> 
> Unfortunately, fusepy is slow or maybe even dead upstream -- master has not
> seen a commit in years and a fuse3 compatibility PR has been sitting without
> comment upstream for over a month [1]. I think it is unlikely that migration
> to fuse3 is possible in a short timeframe.

If it is upstream-dead, maybe it's time to evaluate if it should be
kept for trixie. You probably know best.


> > If you cannot migrate yet, please at least update your Depends: line.
> > If you currently have:
> > 
> > > Depends: fuse
> > 
> > please update that to:
> > 
> > > Depends: fuse3 (>= 3.10.1-3) | fuse (<< 3)
> 
> This package depends on libfuse and provides ctypes bindings to libfuse. I
> don't think the above line is rather meant to be used for packages that
> actually use mount.fuse and fusermount?

The line is meant for packages currently having "Depends: fuse".
"python3-fusepy" apparently does not have that, so this doesn't
apply.

> Would just using
> 
>   Depends: fuse (<<3)
> 
> be ok?

No :-)

Best,
Chris

Reply via email to