On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 09:41:24PM +0200, Lars Lindner wrote: > > Yes, no hanging processes. > > > > This originally built up over the course of 2 months, when I noticed I > > had aroudn 24 useless dbus-daemon proceses, none with any parent. I can > > assure you liferea had only one process. > > > > Here is my system before liferea launch: > > > > [...] > > Strange thing. But then again starting with "dbus-launch" is the only > way to use DBUS...
I tried to read the dbus documentation and failed, because I just didn't care enough to dig through wire protocols and library specs and etc to find out what the use patterns and lifespans of processes were. I think it requires some higher level documentation which is not currently available. I would not be surprised if this is not really the only to use dbus. I would not be surprised if it is and dbus is deeply riddled with design flaws. Feel free to turn this into a design flaw bug with dbus if that is correct. In fact, I filed a really vague, and low quality one already. #372724 -josh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
