On Sat, Dec 14, 2024 at 01:46:18PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: > A quick codesearch suggests that `dh_buildinfo` still appears in about 20-25 > packages and not all of them having a `if dh_buildinfo exists` guard. So if > I add those without a `dh_buildinfo` script to go with it, there will be > FTBFS bugs.
I think that is an acceptable number but I'm clearly biased. :)
> I can add those three lines to `debhelper`, no problem. But I assume
> "someone else" will handle the clean up/fall out. To be clear, that "someone
> else" is not going to me.
The clearness is appreciated!
> So before I add it, who will clean up the reminder? (Just so I know it is
> not going to fall between 5 chairs with everyone going "I thought you had
> it")
I will. I've also filed #1089874 ("drop depends on dh-buildinfo from
haskell-devscripts")
today, which - with rebuilds - will handle most of the problems more to the
core.
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
⠈⠳⣄
Where will you go when you become a climate refugee?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
