On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 03:02:31PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Sun, 11 Jun 2006, Daniel Kobras wrote: > > I'm still concerned about the change, though. You're removing the > > logo first, then add a different one. Are you certain that this is > > sufficiently distinct from modifying the logo, which is not > > permitted by the license? > > The logo itself is totally removed before I even begin to add back the > new logo. There's no patching at all going on in the removal (just a > few rm's and a regex which removes it totally.) Since at no point do > we ever modify the logo, it should be perfectly ok.
That's understood, of course. From a user's perspective, the end result is indistinguishable from a modification, though. Eg. the output of the 'logo:' pseudo-type. Regards, Daniel. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
