On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 01:26:31AM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > > Could you please extend that to armel? Patch follows. > > Hi. I personally don't like the strategy of having different values > for different architectures in cases like this one. > > If we have to increase the timeout, let's do it for everybody. > If it needs to be double the current one, let's double it. > > I would propose an alternative patch, but I don't know where exactly > the timeout is defined...
I have no real opinion on this as long as it stops getting in the way of the Python 3.13 addition :-) -- Colin Watson (he/him) [[email protected]]
