From: Matthias Klose <[email protected]> Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2025 11:09:53 +0100
> yes, none would be the correct choice, as done for the gcc-arm-none-eabi > package. The triplet came from the freedom-e-sdk toolchain, which this used to be built from. As that appears to be dead now, we could certainly change it. Of course, we'd need to provide a compatibility mechanism to avoid breaking existing users. However, I wonder if 'unknown' isn't correct here -- while this toolchain *can* be used for bare metal applications, it is also usable with a variety of RTOS, including Zephyr, RIOT and FreeRTOS. So, I'm not sure 'none' is right either? -- -keith
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
