On Wed, 05 Feb 2025 at 14:35:00 -0500, Jeremy Bícha wrote: > Christian has some questions as he considers implementing this > upstream. (I apologize if you already saw the notification there.)
Thanks, I replied upstream. If he's willing to implement the
x-terminal-emulator interface upstream, then we won't need an equivalent
of gnome-terminal.wrapper, which would be great.
My order of preference would be:
-e implemented upstream > we add a wrapper > not being an x-terminal-emulator
smcv
