Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > > > This patch has been on queue for long time: > > > > > > http://bugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=354972 > > > > > > What' the status of it? > > Yeek. This patch is rather intrusive. debian-readme might sound > intuitive, but it's in fact not intuitive, since readme-debian is a > map of what the files it's supposed to edit are: README.Debian. > > And the change is rather dramatic, isn't it?
I guess. But someone is ore likely to do `M-x debian[TAB]' and find it than `M-x readme[TAB]'. It's up to you, but please close the bug it you reject it. > > I was letting Junichi take care of all issues relative to this file, > > since he is the author and has CVS access. I'll let him answer, but I > > think your suggestion is a good idea. > > > > There's also this one to look at: > > > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=364234 > > Humph, thanks. > > considering > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/strftime.html > > and considering xemacs help for format-time-string claims: > The number of options reflects the `strftime' function. > > that's a bug on xemacs... :-) Might still take a long time to get fixed if you choose to not work around it. Up to you. Please reassign the bug to xemacs if you decide to go that route. > I probably now need to find out why I'm not subscribed to this package > through PTS. Good stuff. Thanks! -- Peter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
