-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 05/27/2006 11:04 AM, Florian Ludwig wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> it looks okay to me cause the second sentence "NT and XP have shown
> themselves to be very bad also". Although if we mention windows 95 we
> should also mention 98 instead of skipping it.
> 
> Otherwise i would mark this bug as "will not fixed" if nobody disagree.
> 
> greetings,
> Florian Ludwig

        Maybe we could rephrase the sentence for something like:

        Windows 95 has essentially no security. Later versions (including
        Windows 98/Me) and more recent ones (NT and XP) have shown
        themselves to be very bad also.


        Probably it will need some review because I'm a non-native speaker.
        Kind regards,

- --
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
"Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEkiZaCjAO0JDlykYRAgXEAJ92EJdmYBoFpxeUWIo17UXQTELaEwCfTASg
JmEKnaTcsKmpDQegWkgEmYY=
=ITdU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to