On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 12:08:20AM +0900, AWASHIRO Ikuya wrote: > Hi Osamu, > > On Sat, 17 Jun 2006 07:47:03 +0900 > Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I will do NMU on this and similar packages to clean up situation since > > this easy bug has not been fixed about a month. Patch attached for the > > record. > Please support scim-immodule not only XIM as I said before. > After adding it, I will remove im-switch hook.
Hmmm.... I thought we convinced you not to recommend using immodule. The only benefit of using immodule is location of selection window for me and it is too small gain when looking at statement in README.Debian and README.GTK in scim package. Ming clearly states not to use immodule as the lead scim package maintainer. Let me quote: > The package scim-gtk2-immodule provides GTK IM mode for SCIM. > Contrary to the popular conception, you do NOT need this package to be > able to use SCIM in GTK+/GNOME applications. Those applications can > use XIM mode just fine. For more details, please read README.GTK. In README.GTK, his comment over the improvement of 1.4.3 is very insightful. If you still insist SCIM needs to be offered as immodule under X (we are not under Windows) as the system default for scim-anthy after reading these, please come up with quotable explanation which I can put in the changelog or README.Debian. (The dead-key issue was also mentioned before on immodule.) I will add configurastion for immodule in scim package as "scim-immodule" if your good explanation comes. One configuration should be enough. Please do not make the choice of im-switch to be noisy one by offering many scim-anthy, scim-skk, .... etc. which do the same things. Please use my new 1.4.4-3 package of SCIM and tell me what you lost using SCIM via XIM. Osamu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
