On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 20:34:34 +0200 Paul Gevers <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,

The response from Justin never got a reply. Justin didn't agree with most of the remarks, hence I'm closing this bug.

Paul



Hello Paul,


I object to your closing of my bug report. I object because the reasons you gave do not, and not at all, justify your closing.

My bug report was sent on 17 September 2019. The very next day you wrote to [email protected]:

Dear debian-l10n-english members,

Yesterday, I received the following bug report about the templates of
dbconfig-common. I recall the templates have been reviewed on this list
in the past, could you please comment on the remarks by Maarten?

Within three hours, your e-mail was answered by Justin B. Rye. However, in the period from 3 March 2015 to 18 August 2019, Justin B. Rye and he alone, had been involved 29 times in reviewing the English templates of dbconfig-common. Therefore, Justin B. Rye was not independent.

Justin B. Rye was like a butcher who examines the quality of his own meat after being publicly confronted with a complaint about his meat. Unsurprisingly, he claims publicly that there is nothing wrong with his meat. You must have been fully aware of this, Paul.

Because the esteem of Justin B. Rye was fully at stake, his comments on my bug report are untrustworthy. Even if your e-mail had been answered by another member of debian-l10-english, the answer cannot be qualified as independent.

When you wrote to debian-l10n-english on 18 September 2019, I received a copy of your e-mail by the Bug Tracking System. I was surprised to read that your templates had been reviewed in the past. I also read the response of Justin B. Rye. After I found out that he himself had reviewed the English templates in the past, I concluded that neither it would make any sense nor there was any need to respond.

After I received your e-mail of 22 April 2025 by the Bug Tracking System, I have read through the response of Justin B. Rye once more. His response is very tendentious and seems dishonest. This must have led me to investigate whether he had been directly involved in the past.


Sincerely,

Maarten

Reply via email to