On Sat, May 31, 2025 at 04:00:41PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi Jelmer,
On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 16:31:06 +0000 Jelmer =?utf-8?Q?Vernoo=C4=B3?=
<jel...@jelmer.uk> wrote:
Is this repeatable or perhaps a flaky test?
Any progress on this bug? The FTBFS is hindering the migration to
testing of the fix for RC bug 1099121. We're running out of time for
trixie.
Mind you, I very much prefer a targeted for both issues (reverting to
the version in testing) because the diff between unstable and testing
is huge (and thus most likely inappropriate at this stage):
47 files changed, 835 insertions(+), 3572 deletions(-)
Unfortunately not - I'm swamped by other stuff (upstream and otherwise), and
skeptical this is a actually a new regression. I haven't had the time to
actually go back and see whether this is reproducible with older versions
though.
Most of the recent delta between unstable and testing was actually for
addressing 1099121,
so I'm not sure how much you could reduce that (unless you were to prevent
compilation
of some cython files rather than deleting them).
Jelmer
