Hello, On Wed 04 Jun 2025 at 03:26pm +03, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> Hi, > >> > The topic seems related to Ian's drive to start using the 1.0 source >> > format again for new packages, like he did in xtruss, despite my >> > recommendation and ignoring the example of how the same can and should >> > be done with format 3.0 >> > (https://salsa.debian.org/salsa-ci-team/pipeline/-/issues/396). >> > >> > I suggest the changes in this Bug#1107137 would be postponed for now >> > and the format discussed at the next DebConf. >> >> I disagree - the TC ruled in >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1007717#384 that > > I checked a couple of those 158 remaining packages and I noticed you > are among those who are using this 1.0 format intentionally. You > should be honest that you have been doing this already before the TC > accepted Ian's proposal to rule that 1.0 format is acceptable, and the > TC decision is not the reason you do this, but the permission for you > to continue. Otto, as Matthew and Russ noted, this Policy bug isn't the place to dispute the TC's decision. Please don't continue to do that here. -- Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
