GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At Mon, 28 Feb 2005 03:48:00 +0100, > Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> Bastian's patch is just a workaround around the bug not its solution. > > ...So why did you submit this bug as "severity: critical" assigned to > linux-kernel-header? What the real solution to fix this report? > > Can your problem be fixed to define O_NOATIME in lvm2 or > linux-kernel-headers package? > > Regards, > -- gotom
I assigned the bug is to both. The headers because they have the bug and lvm because it can work around it (thereby reducing its severity to normal). If you don't think l-k-h oder libc6-dev should implement the O_NOATIME it documents then please reassign it to lvm2 alone with an explanation. That is your perogative as maintainer but I stand by my decision that it is a critical bug and both packages are involved. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]