tags 374579 + patch pending upstream thanks On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 01:30:58AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 10:10:57PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I need some help with this bug, I'm quite convinced it's not a cpufreqd > > bug but I'm asking before reassigning (glibc or kernel?). > > Well I am afraid you are wrong. It is not because a backtrace ends in a > glibc function that the bug is here.
sorry, it was the kernel barfing that lead me to a dead end. > In your case, it's because cpufreqd is using a va_list twice. It does > not work. Well it works on i386, but it is guaranteed to fail on all > other architectures. Please see man stdarg for more information. > > The patch below should fix your problem (not tested). Yup! thanks, thanks and again thanks for looking into this! -- mattia :wq! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
