Hi Lorenzo, On Wed, Oct 08, 2025 at 10:15:13AM +0200, Lorenzo wrote: > I'll put this one on hold for now.
Reasonable. > This is likely the only package in the archive that needs to enable the > runit service even when runit is not init, so I don't like adding > support for this case in runit-helper. Also, I want to phase out > runit-helper in favor of the trigger/metafiles interface in runit > package, so another point against extending runit-helper for this case. A trigger would be great! I would be much more likely to contribute runit service directories to other packages if it didn't introduce a runtime dependency that maintainers may find less appealing. Do you think you'll be able to get that into forky? (I wonder if we can also trim the number of metafiles that need adding? It can double the number of lines in the list of files in a small daemon package.) > I'll see if I can properly test some variation of the patch on > systemd/sysv, otherwise I'll go with the Readme and maybe update the > package description too. Sorry I don't think I got round to testing your second version of this solution. I'll report back if I do.
