Dear Bastian,
I tried to reach the upstream for co-maintaining, but with no success.
I can work on fuse3 port for jmtpfs, considering the popcorn.
And can fork it to project oss revival for long term maintenance.
Attached for reference I sent this email in December.
Kind regards,
Syed Shahrukh Hussain.
On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 6:31 PM Bastian Germann <[email protected]> wrote:
> Control: severity -1 normal
> Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
> Control: retitle -1 RM: jmtpfs -- RoQA; upstream abandoned; RC-buggy
>
> Please drop jmtpfs. It was not touched upstream in over a decade and
> will thus probably not be ported to fuse3, which makes it RC-buggy.
>
>
--- Begin Message ---
Dear Jason,
I am reaching you for jmtpfs for long term maintenance.
Present maintenance is primarily handled through package patches on Debian.
The package has a decent user base(
https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=jmtpfs) on Debian, not counting
Debian derivatives and is about to be removed.
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/jmtpfs
So I am suggesting jmtpfs maintenance under the Project oss revival to
materialize the future of jmtpfs.
I need your opinion in this regard.
Thanks,
Syed Shahrukh Hussain.
--
OSS Revival
Empowering open-source, one project at a time.
*https://ossrevival.org/ <https://ossrevival.org/>*
--- End Message ---
