On Wed, May 06, 2026 at 05:58:18PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Tue, 2026-04-28 at 13:02:24 +0900, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Please read these things before submitting them :( Optional seems > > fairly obviously not a sensible priority here. > Ah, but it is! This was codified in the Debian Policy version 4.0.1, > from its upgrade checklist: > Priorities are now used only for controlling which packages are > part of a minimal or standard Debian installation and should be > selected based on functionality provided directly to users (so > nearly all shared libraries should have a priority of "optional"). > Packages may now depend on packages with a lower priority. Well, that's really leading to something helpful and clear isn't it :(
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
